Although highly unlikely, history has a way of either repeating itself or proving us wrong. In our previous article, we looked into the proof of reserves of Binance and found out that on the “clean reserve’ scale, they are closing in on the 90% mark. Today, we talk about the entirety of Binance’s FUD, but not with the intention of spreading it but bringing awareness.
As the clock continues to tick, time has its unique way of revealing truths. It is only a matter of time, and until then, your main goal is survival. By that, I mean protecting your funds by getting them all under self-custody and out of the centralized exchanges your regularly patronize.
The clock is ticking, “you have only a few hours/days left to withdraw from exchanges.”
The mysterious case of minted BNB
Call it sus as you may, but the fourth largest wallet, which holds 22M worth of BNB, has no transaction history of funds being deposited. One beauty of the blockchain is its open-sourced nature, so this wallet is particularly interesting.
With only nine recorded transactions to its name and two deposits for less than 0.0001 BNB, it begs the question, where on earth did the 22M BNB come from?
Now 22M BNB is worth ~ $5.7B. That is no amount you would have oversight on, but it has been left unaccounted for.
There are so many questions about the “BNB Printer” I have right now. Firstly, are they inflating reserves? We know how that ended up with the entire FTX saga. Secondly, could it be that they are purposefully masking certain transactions?
Could Binance has way more BNB than it declared in the reserves? What are the implications of this?
The hidden risks holding BUSD
Did you know the issuer of BUSD (Binance USD) is not Binance themselves but involves another entity called PAXOS?
According to PAXOS, BUSD on Binance smart chain is created by Binance, which is therefore not regulated by NYDFS.
Here is where we have to tread carefully. It has to be clear that USDP and BUSD are two different stablecoins, and not all BUSD is regulated. They are not all the same, either.
TLDR, the only BUSD which are regulated are on the Ethereum blockchain; anywhere else is simply synthetics.
Again, reading this a little further made me ponder a few questions, could this be a similar case to how FTX used FTT? If naming conventions are purposefully masked, I wonder how far they would go to hide other things. But of course, these are all speculation; they are innocent until proven guilty.
It might be wise to get out of any BUSD, and once the dust settles, you can decide to re-enter again. But the main takeaway should be the first part of the sentence, to get out.
Chinese exchange cartel?
There is some circulating evidence to suggest that Chinese exchanges sent large amounts of funds to each other right before the world demanded proof of reserves, which did its ‘cleansing’ of centralized entities.
I subscribe to the idea that there needs to be balance at this stage of web3 and crypto. This can be in the form of crypto and regulation, privacy and open-sourced nature, and how centralized entities play a part in laying the groundwork of web3.
But if this turns out to be accurate, faith in any centralized entities will be zero. And so will crypto as a whole.
Not all coins are made the same; some are better than others.
The proof of reserve from Binance shows us that BTC & ETH make up only 24.5% of the reserves, while BUSD, USDT & BNB alone make up 57% of the reserves.
The low amount of BTC on the exchange reminds me that FTX had no Bitcoin in its wallets when it failed. These are just some PTSD thoughts; it could be my spidey senses, though.
When BTC and ETH are entirely drained in this reserve, do investors get their funds back in BNB? or maybe BUSD (which one, though, lol)?
It now has to ring some bells, centralized entities and their native tokens. Now That FTX has Broken The Trust For Everyone, What’s Next For Us?
Different company, same message?
This could be the stars aligning, pure coincidence or people at the top have a handbook titled “a dummies guide on how to console crypto investors”.
Here are some sources for both Binance and Celsius CEO telling us that retail investors will lose their crypto in self-custody, likely implying that we should leave our coins with them instead.
And here’s one of Alex Mashinsky of Celsius.
People in management are stepping down
Remember the head of Alameda Research, Trabucco, stepping down right before the fallout of FTX? If you need any indicator, people in management stepping down and, after that, the company failing could possess a higher success rate than the RSI and Bollinger band indicators you use for trading.
But this, again, might be very well untrue. So let me slap that “allegedly” sticker first.
The common denominator is the auditor
That is the auditor that all these Chinese exchanges use.
This could be another successful indicator; you must run faster when the auditor runs.
These two don’t add up.
Still looking for answers to why Binance has to make customers wait 12 hours to take their coins off the exchange when they said they are in a good financial position.
Could all these be delay tactics?
While you can, there is no better time than now. Now is the best time to be self-custody. Watch how things unfold from afar; being part of the audience is okay.
If you choose to get all your funds out, here are some wallet characteristics you should note.
[Editor’s Note: This article does not represent financial advice. Please do your research before investing.]
Featured Image Credit: Chain Debrief